Complete Guide: BluEvolution 92 vs GreenEvolution 76 — Which Salamander PVC Profile Is Right for You?

Why Does the PVC Profile Choice Matter?

Choosing the right PVC profile is one of the most important decisions when building or renovating a home. The profile determines not only the visual appearance of the windows, but also energy performance, acoustic insulation and long-term durability.

Salamander, the German manufacturer with over 50 years of experience, offers two distinct ranges for the premium segment: BluEvolution 92 and GreenEvolution 76.

BluEvolution 92 — Salamander's Top-of-the-Range Profile

Technical Specifications

The "92" designation indicates a construction depth of 92 mm — the largest in the Salamander range — allowing a glazing package of up to 48 mm thickness.

Key technical data:

• Construction depth: 92 mm
• Number of chambers: 6 chambers in profile + additional chamber in sash
• Profile thermal coefficient Uf: 0.95 W/m²K
• Window thermal coefficient Uw: down to 0.70 W/m²K with triple low-e + argon glazing
• Acoustic insulation: up to 47 dB Rw
• Compatible with: double and triple glazing, including argon and krypton
• Certification: nZEB

Available Variants

BluEvolution 92 Aluminium Clad — PVC profile covered with aluminium foil on the exterior. Aluminium appearance, PVC insulation. Available in any RAL colour.

BluEvolution 92 Flex — chamfered corner design, modern minimalist aesthetic.

BluEvolution 92 Round — classic rounded corners, preferred in renovations.

Advantages

• ✅ Best thermal insulation in the Salamander range
• ✅ Compatible with triple glazing — essential for nZEB
• ✅ Aluminium clad variant — premium appearance without aluminium cost
• ✅ Ideal for passive houses and high energy standard construction

Disadvantages

• ⚠️ ️ Price 15–25% higher than GreenEvolution 76
• ⚠️ ️ Heavier weight — requires higher quality hardware
• ⚠️ ️ 92 mm depth may cause aesthetic issues with narrow window sills

GreenEvolution 76 — Excellent Performance for the Price

Technical Specifications

Key technical data:

• Construction depth: 76 mm
• Number of chambers: 5 chambers
• Profile thermal coefficient Uf: 1.1 W/m²K
• Window thermal coefficient Uw: down to 1.0 W/m²K with double low-e glazing
• Acoustic insulation: up to 42 dB
• Compatible with: standard double glazing, triple with adaptation

Available Variants

GreenEvolution 76 MdRound — modern rounded design. Most popular variant.

GreenEvolution 76 MdFlex — modern design with chamfered edges.

GreenEvolution 76 AdFlex — advanced architectural design, visually narrow profile.

Advantages

• ✅ Excellent value for money
• ✅ Very good thermal performance for standard homes
• ✅ Lighter weight — windows easier to operate
• ✅ Versatile design — suits most architectural styles

Disadvantages

• ⚠️ ️ Does not reach the extreme nZEB values of BluEvolution 92
• ⚠️ ️ Limitations with very thick glazing packages

Direct Comparison

Neofort BIZ Recommendation

Choose BluEvolution 92 if:

• You are building a new house and want to achieve nZEB standard
• You have large windows with north or east exposure
• Your area has cold winters — mountains, rural regions
• Your budget allows an investment with recovery through energy savings

Choose GreenEvolution 76 if:

• You are renovating and replacing old windows
• Budget is optimised but you want certified quality
• You live in temperate climate areas
• The priority is value for money, not maximum performance

Conclusion

BluEvolution 92 for maximum demands, GreenEvolution 76 for optimal value-for-money. The Neofort BIZ team offers free technical consultancy and personalised thermal calculations. Contact us for a detailed quote.